Now Playing Tracks

Anonymous

Anonymous asked:

honestly the skullgirls censorship is 100% okay, good even.

shuunnico:

It really isn’t.

Censorship is a constantly advancing tide and without pushback it will eventually come for the artists and art you like. The only way you can stop this is to stand against censorship, even of art you dislike or find distasteful.

There are only specific cases where art has to be curtailed and it has nothing to do with offense or discomfort. It has everything to do with if real people are being harmed. And even then, these aren’t clear cut because what constitutes ‘harm’ is a scale.

This isn’t even touching on the fact that censoring and changing the paid digital artbook is extremely scummy. Remember, people bought the art book for the guest art (removed) and concept art (censored). It highlights the problem with digital media and how companies can (and will) erase things in acts of revisionism at the cost of accuracy, the consumer and authenticity.

And then there’s the fact that Skullgirls was crowdfunded. People funded the game based on expectations; expectations that are being violated. Stretch goals that were met and added to the game are now being removed. How is that appropriate?

The Skullgirls debacle is bad. It is bad from a censorship point of view. It is bad from a media history point of view. It is bad from a consumer point of view.

As an artist and someone concerned with good consumer practices, this is an abhorrent situation.

Nothing about it is good. Please, sit down and reconsider your position. Saying “censorship is good” should be an immediate red flag that you are not one of the good guys.

rontology:

I finally switched to firefox and I’ve seen a lot of posts about the effortless importing of preferences from chrome and how it’s important to support non-chromium platforms, but nobody is talking about the loss of productivity that happens when beautiful women come to your house to kiss you on the mouth because they heard you use firefox now. nobody’s talking about this

Anonymous

Anonymous asked:

Just noticed. But isn't it real fucking ironic that the mindset is "Marginalized people never got anything from being nice and polite." in response to criticizing them for burning down, and hurting people, especially other marginalized people. But then also these people being the type to be super anti-gun and pro-Government? Just me? Maybe? Just saying.

sunder-the-gold:

sunder-the-gold:

un-solids-your-snake:

They call that a useful idiot

I’m thinking of, but cannot find, the meme with the two-headed Democrat voter and its circular logic behind Gun Control.

Here it is:

image

sunder-the-gold:

witch-hattery:

sunder-the-gold:

lycanthology:

wish ppl understood the power nowadays in not giving something attention. things today are so focused on attention and reaction and #memes that the best way to shut literally anything down is simply not give it exactly what it wants. like you arent going to own that bigot on twitter youre going to boost their original message whether thats your intent or not and you arent just playing with ai for shits and giggles you are giving it free learning and data. just stop engaging with things that dont deserve it

To extinguish a fire, deny it oxygen.

Punching that one nazi made him famous.

He didn’t manage to keep his audience for long, but still, it gave him a spotlight.

And the thing that lost him the audience? Someone inviting him onto their show and asking him about his ideas, which allowed people to see that he was stupid and crazy.

foone:

foone:

I haven’t seen it get mentioned on Tumblr yet but Samsung has just gotten caught in a hilarious scam: they apparently advertised how their latest phones can take great picture of the moon, compared to other phones!

But it turns out they aren’t using machine-learning to clear up blurry pictures, they’re using machine-learning to detect when you’re taking a picture of the moon, and then they swap in a saved PNG file of the moon.

A reddit user figured this out by taking a photo of the moon from Wikipedia, blurring it in photoshop, then trying to photograph it from across the room with all the lights turned out.

Their Samsung phone somehow managed to “clear up” the blurriness and recover details that weren’t there in the first place. Because it’s just cheating.

Here’s the first reddit post in the saga.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/11nzrb0/samsung_space_zoom_moon_shots_are_fake_and_here/


Next step obviously is for someone to disassemble the camera app, find the PNG, and replace it with something else.

We make Tumblr themes